The Transformation of Ohio and America | Interpretive Framework | Discussions

 
You must be logged in to post Login Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

The Transformation of Ohio and America

No Tags
UserPost

2:39 pm
December 19, 2009


Ohio Civil War 150

Admin

posts 4

Read the entire interpretive framework here.

Well before the outbreak of war in 1861, the United States and Ohio were in the midst of enormous social, political and economic changes. The events and the demands of the Civil War let loose, accelerated and compounded a whole host of transformations that restructured everyday life in America. Although there were elements of deep-seated continuity during this era, pronounced changes during a time of already existing rapid change recast both the state and the nation.

During the war, thousands of ordinary Ohio residents-people who tended farms, worked in factories, fought in the trenches, cared for the wounded and transported supplies-contributed to this multitude of related changes in concrete and specific ways. A microcosm of the nation at that time, Ohio was a complicated blend of rural and urban, eastern and western, northern and southern, and its population consisted of transplants from all sections of the country. In addition, immigrants from many other lands settled in the state. As a result, successful leaders, inventions, products, procedures and ideas that first emerged and then flourished in Ohio proved subsequently to be popular and effective in other parts of the nation as well. Changes in Ohio were part of the larger transformation of American life during that era.

While the arenas and consequences of change were diverse and innumerable, certain aspects of the transformation were more prevalent and apparent than others. The following dimensions are rich with possibilities for exploration and public programming.

Racial Views

The Civil War was a watershed moment in race relations not only in the nation at large but also within Ohio itself. The 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution are among the most striking manifestations of the dramatic changes in racial relations, but there were also many others, some subtle and some palpable. For example, military families from Ohio had a large stake in this issue because of their sacrifices during the war years. There are documented cases of white Union soldiers from Ohio who entered the war believing that African Americans should never have political rights or equality but who, as a consequence of firsthand experience, were transformed by what they learned about African American men on the battlefield. By war's end, they supported the extension of citizenship rights to African Americans.

Women's Roles

As a consequence of wartime disruptions in daily life, women became more active in a variety of ways, and their newly assumed responsibilities led to changes in gender role expectations. Many served as nurses and, like Mary Ann Bickerdyke, as organizers and leaders in providing health care for soldiers. During the war women took on duties in homes, on farms and at businesses that were previously performed almost exclusively by men. Similarly, in the public sphere, women raised funds in support of the war effort, collected supplies for the armies, and, in certain instances, became vocal political proponents for freedom. Other women-weary and resentful of the war and its effects on their families-became outspoken supporters of the Peace Democrats. Some women simply wrote powerful and defiant letters expressing their disenchantment with the war. In these varied ways and others, women took the opportunity to act on matters formerly considered the province of men only.

Ohio in the Nation

The status of Ohio in the nation changed markedly as a consequence of the Civil War. Ohio-born army generals like Ulysses Grant, William Sherman, and Philip Sheridan were prominent in major military campaigns that made the Union victory possible. Similarly, Ohio provided the nation with key members in the wartime cabinet and high profile representatives and senators in the halls of Congress. Ohio's industrialists and financiers generated the both the materials and the funds for a successful war effort. After the war, Ohio continued to play a leading role in the nation's public life. Prior to the Civil War, no native-born Ohioan had been president; over the next two generations, seven Ohio-born men were elected to this office. Five of these presidents were former officers in the Union army.

Other related manifestations of change are similarly cogent, significant and worthy of pursuit. Examples include changes in the make-up of the state's population, the foundations of its burgeoning economy, the relationship between the state and national governments, and also the relationship between contemporary citizens and their government. These all areas in which Ohioans initiated and experienced substantial change-both intended and unexpected-during this time of war, upheaval, innovation and reorganization.

8:49 pm
February 18, 2010


HistoryMaven

Guest

The interpretive framework for Ohio's Civil War Sesquicentennial observances is exemplary, but disappointing in the lack of attention to the gendered dimension of language.

For example, women are subsumed in the categories of "Ohioans" and "African Americans." In descriptions of these groups' activities, the verbs are active, and the actions described are generally and traditionally masculine/male activities.

Yet, in the section describing women's activities, we learn that they played "roles." Men fought, African Americans seized opportunities, but women became–the difference in active and passive is glaring and unfortunate.

May I ask that, if the Advisory Committee is indeed committed to using the Sesquicentennial as a means of inviting and fostering more inclusive interpretation, that more care be taken in matching idea to word?

11:37 am
February 25, 2010


kkuehling

Admin

posts 79

Thank you for your comments and suggestions! Unfortunately, this difference in language is pretty common when describing women's activities throughout history and I am sorry to see we have also fallen into that trap. The interpretive framework will be finalized soon and I will make sure to mention the passive language to the authors as well as the Advisory Committee. You may be interested in looking over our online exhibit about women in the Civil War. It illustrates many of the amazing contributions of women and even features some great stories about women who disguised themselves as men in order to fight on the battlefield! Do you happen to know anyone who would like to be a guest author on our site in order to share more information about women in the war?

11:47 am
June 1, 2010


HistoryMaven

Guest

Many apologies for not responding more quickly to your post of 25 February.

Thanks for directing my attention to the online exhibitions. After reviewing these, however, I find that they fall into the same gender trap as the language used in the interpretive framework. In order to be recognized as contributing to the cause, women have to be men–disguise themselves as spies or soldiers. Only a very small minority of women undertook these strategies and therefore represent the exception rather than the rule. Women's historians have decried "contributionist history" since the 1970s, but here it is, again, 40 years later. Those "great stories" are defined within a masculine interpretive framework.

The issue is how to address, understand, and explain women's attitudes, behaviors, choices, and activities–collectively and individually–within a framework that remains true to the historical context but also enlivens current understanding of the legal, economic, social, and political status of women during this period. We need to understand women's lives and consciousness on their own terms. For example, no where in the online exhibition do we learn about women's legal status–what military law had the unnamed sergeant broken? Being a woman or giving birth? What were the sociocultural mores involved with nursing? Was this formerly a male duty in the military?

As the exhibition now stands (with its errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation) we learn very little about the majority of Ohio's women during the Civil War. But we do come away with the impression that a relatively few women wished to take up arms (even though we don't know why in every case) and that somehow that represents many women's attitudes. It doesn't, and it shouldn't. What's omitted (that the men in a company with a woman knew their fellow soldier was a female, that a female disguised as a male soldier gave birth with no mention of possible rape, etc.) gives rise to sensationalism rather than historical thinking.

It's more than gendered language here; it's a mindset that has little to do with how all Ohioans in the past reckoned their world and more with current scholarship on the Civil War that focuses on battlefields rather than the homefront. I beg to differ with the assertion that the "difference in language is pretty common when describing women's activities throughout history": after all, this is the era in which women were changing the social, cultural, and political landscape through abolitionism, temperance, women's rights, and educational reform.

2:50 pm
June 4, 2010


kkuehling

Admin

posts 79

Hello HistoryMaven,

We appreciate your comments! We've been working on finding more historians from around the state to write our exhibits and other content on the website. I've made a few minor changes to the exhibit for now but I have passed along your comments to Jackie Barton, the Ohio Civil War 150 coordinator.

Please remember that our exhibits are not meant to provide a comprehensive history of Ohio in the Civil War. We believe our exhibits will increase awareness of unfamiliar topics and encourage our audience to find out more by using the suggested reading and resources provided for each topic. With the participation of historians and the public, we will be adding to and reworking our exhibits (and other online content) throughout the anniversary. If you would like to contribute to our exhibits, please let us know.

Thank you,

Kristina

No Tags

About the Ohio Civil War 150 Forum

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit

Most Users Ever Online: 69

Currently Online:
11 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1
Forums: 15
Topics: 113
Posts: 224

Membership:

There are 1112 Members
There have been 45 Guests

There are 3 Admins
There are 4 Moderators

Top Posters:

Bob Minton – 17
andrewjarvi – 12
Buckeye – 10
cmccune – 8
Visitwithabe – 8
Emmeline – 7

Recent New Members: buckeyegent, kittbone, timelessvoices, pacquiaovideo, MelissaLuthman, andySWFCHS

Administrators: kkuehling (79 Posts), Erin (13 Posts), Ohio Civil War 150 (4 Posts)

Moderators: strobes223 (0 Posts), jodiem (0 Posts), Melanie_J (0 Posts), MelissaLuthman (0 Posts)